FINDING · SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 · CORRECTED SEPTEMBER 30, 2026

The pardon donation trail anyone can search
is nearly empty.

The obvious theory about this administration’s clemency is that pardons follow donations. Federal campaign contributions are the part of that theory the public can check donor by donor, so we checked it: on September 17, 2026, we ran 71 names from the clemency record against the Federal Election Commission’s own filings. 62 of them return no contribution of $5,000 or more ($2,500 for the 29 names in the September 3 batch) in the 2024 and 2026 election cycles, and neither do the two names we added the next day.

That is not a debunking, and we are not claiming no pardon was bought. It is a measurement of where the money is not. Apart from Trevor Milton’s own donations, none of the payments this record documents shows up as a recipient’s own campaign contribution. They show up under a relative’s name, in a broker’s fee or in a lobbying contract, and much of that is public too: the FEC publishes a relative’s gift under the relative’s name, and registered lobbyists disclose their clients and fees under the Lobbying Disclosure Act. Jack Burkman’s firm reported $960,000 from Joseph Schwartz for “Seeking a federal pardon,” and Bloomberg reported that Binance paid Checkmate Government Relations $450,000 for a month of lobbying that included “executive relief.” This sweep searched FEC filings only. What it shows is that for the 73 names we checked, the recent campaign-finance filings have now been read name by name, and under those names the trail is nearly empty.

Corrected September 30, 2026. A fact-check found errors on this page, and we have fixed them; the change is also recorded in the corrections log. What changed:
  • An earlier version, including the headline, said campaign contributions were the only money trail the public could search and that the payments this record documents sit where no filing system publishes them per person; the FEC publishes relatives’ gifts under the relatives’ names and lobbying fees are disclosed by client under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, but none of it appears under the recipients’ own names in FEC filings.
  • An earlier version said lobbying and broker payments are where this record’s documented money sits; that is true of three of the five cases below, but in the other two the money is a relative’s super PAC gift reported to the FEC, $4.5 million in all.
  • An earlier version said 62 names returned “nothing at all”; they returned no contribution of $5,000 or more ($2,500 for the September 3 batch) in the 2024 and 2026 election cycles, and giving before 2023 was not searched.
  • An earlier version said the sweep covered the clemency record as of September 17, 2026; it covered 73 names (71 on that date and two the next day), and 94 of the 156 people on the Justice Department’s list, as well as nearly everyone covered by the January 6 and 2020-election proclamations, were not searched.
  • An earlier version said we searched individual contributions; it was a contributor-name search of all itemized receipts (Schedule A), which is why Henry Cuellar’s committee transfers appear.
  • An earlier version said three further names were run on September 18, 2026; two were new, and the third, Emory Jones, was re-run at the lower $2,500 threshold.
  • An earlier version said the first 42 names included two relatives of recipients; there is one, Savannah Chrisley.
  • An earlier version said the five name-alike donors live in states unconnected to the recipients; that is not true of all five. Each is set aside because its city, stated occupation or full name does not fit the recipient, or because the money went to the other party. The earlier version also counted a hyphenated-surname donor as one of the five; that donor was a second person returned by one of the five searches.
  • An earlier version listed four contributions to Trump committees returned by the Kelsey and Peterson searches; two of those rows are shares of the same joint-fundraising gifts, so we count two payments at or above the search threshold. It also gave the amounts of the contribution the Peterson search returned and the committees that received it, though that donor appears to be a different person; those details are removed.
  • An earlier version said the donor’s city did not match the recipient’s in both of those cases; that holds for Peterson, but the Kelsey donor’s Lexington, Kentucky, is where the former senator was reported to be living, though nothing in the filings confirms the donor is him.
  • An earlier version said the FEC does not record 501(c)(4) spending or in-kind support; it records in-kind contributions and 501(c)(4) groups’ election spending, but mostly not who funds those groups.
  • An earlier version described the Binance lobbying contract as four weeks of work on “executive relief”; Bloomberg reported $450,000 for one month of lobbying on financial policy issues and executive relief.
  • An earlier version listed Changpeng Zhao and Ben Delo among the names a reader would expect to find; as foreign nationals they are barred from U.S. contributions, so their absence tells us little.

What we searched

On September 17, 2026 we queried the FEC’s public API for itemized receipts (Schedule A) filed under contributor names drawn from the clemency record, limited to the 2024 and 2026 election cycles (contributions dated January 1, 2023 onward), in two passes:

Two further names, Samuel Reed and Mark Rossini, were run at $5,000 as a follow-up on September 18, 2026, and Emory Jones was re-run at the lower $2,500 threshold. None of the three searches returned a filing at or above its threshold.

That is 73 names in all (71 in the sweep and two in the follow-up), not the whole clemency record. Of the 156 people on the Justice Department’s list of clemency grants as of September 17, 2026, 94 were not searched on either date. The list links the January 6 and 2020-election proclamations but does not include the people they cover in its tables; the sweep included eight of them.

A contribution counts as a match only when the contributor’s name, city and stated employer are all consistent with the person in the record. Where a joint fundraising committee and the receiving committee both report the same transaction, it is one payment, not two.

What came back

62of the 71 names in the September 17 sweep returned no filing at or above the search threshold, 2023–2026
9names returned any row
2payments at or above the threshold to a Trump-affiliated committee
0of those we are willing to call a match

Sixty-two of the seventy-one names in the September 17 sweep produced no qualifying filing whatsoever, and neither did the two follow-up names. They include nearly every name a reader would expect to find: Rudolph Giuliani, Mark Meadows, John Eastman, Kenneth Chesebro, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, Enrique Tarrio, Stewart Rhodes, Todd and Julie Chrisley, Ross Ulbricht, Rod Blagojevich, Devon Archer, Michele Fiore, BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes, and the pardon brokers Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl themselves. Changpeng Zhao and BitMEX’s Ben Delo also returned nothing, but that tells us little: Zhao is a Canadian citizen and Delo a British citizen, and federal law bars foreign nationals who are not U.S. permanent residents from making U.S. contributions.

Reading all nine hits

Nine names returned rows. None of them is a confirmed contribution by a recipient to a Trump committee:

One recipient is documented as a large donor to committees supporting Trump — Trevor Milton, whose giving with his wife exceeded $1.8 million. He was not part of this sweep, because his contributions were already established from FEC filings in his own entry and did not need re-running. Every outlet covering this beat already has Milton. He is the exception; the rest of the search did not confirm a second example.

Five cases where the money is documented

The search failed in an informative direction. The payments this record can actually show are not recipients writing checks to campaigns. They run through people who can give in their own name, and through brokers who charge for access and are under no obligation to deliver. None of these figures comes from the sweep above; each comes from the cited sources on its own entry.

A CLIENT SAYS HE PAID AND GOT NOTHING

Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl (pardon brokers)

Rapper Boosie Badazz told 60 Minutes he paid Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl $600,000 up front to pursue a pardon that never arrived, and has filed an arbitration claim to recover $300,000. Wohl told 60 Minutes there is nothing corrupt or improper about their work; the pair refuse to refund Boosie, calling his contract invalid.

A BROKER WAS PAID AND A PARDON DID FOLLOW

Joseph Schwartz

The compiled clemency record reports Burkman and Wohl accepted $960,000 to lobby for a pardon for Joseph Schwartz. Schwartz then hired Josh Nass, whom prosecutors allege sought $500,000 he said he was owed for pardon work. That charge is an allegation, not a finding; Schwartz is not accused in the case, and the compiled record describes him and his son as its alleged targets.

A RELATIVE GAVE IN HER OWN NAME

Paul Walczak

FEC filings show a $1,000,000 contribution to MAGA Inc. from Walczak’s mother, Elizabeth Fago, dated April 3, 2025, twenty days before his pardon, and his clemency application cited her fundraising. The Daily Beast reported that a White House official told The New York Times the pardon was inspired by her plea as a mother, not by her donation.

A RELATIVE GAVE IN HER OWN NAME

Julio Herrera Velutini and Wanda Vázquez Garced

Campaign Legal Center reports that Julio Herrera Velutini’s 25-year-old daughter, whose only prior donation was $20, gave $3.5 million to the MAGA Inc. super PAC before the pardon. CLC filed a complaint arguing she was not the true source of the money; that is an allegation, not a finding. A White House official told CBS News the donations had nothing to do with the pardon.

A COMPANY BOUGHT LOBBYING, NOT A DONATION

Changpeng “CZ” Zhao (Binance)

Binance retained lobbyist Ches McDowell, a longtime friend of Donald Trump Jr., under a contract Bloomberg reported at $450,000 for one month of lobbying the White House and the Treasury Department on financial policy issues and “executive relief.” Zhao’s lawyer Teresa Goody Guillén told the AP that any claim of a quid pro quo by Binance or CZ is a clear misstatement of the public record.

What this does not show

This is the part that matters most, and we would rather state it than have it pointed out.

Use this, and check it

The ledger data behind this is free, structured and licensed CC BY 4.0 as CSV and JSON. If you are reporting on clemency and want the sweep output (every name searched, the query settings and every hit, with the donors we treat as different people left unidentified), or want a name run, write to the editor — no charge, no condition beyond attribution.

If you find an error here we will correct it and say so in the corrections log, as we have 58 times already.