Four aides. Disclosed cash gifts. A complaint asks whether the payments crossed an ethics line. The White House denies a violation.
Featured archive · Record: Sep 10, 2026
Three documented controversies, with the responses and outcomes attached. Featured archive files, not breaking news.
Reported bedrooms, showers and a government explanation. Read the spending dispute and DHS’s response.
Procurement scrutiny · no finding citedRead the file →Announced, then rescinded. Follow the reversal and the litigation that continued.
Fund rescinded · litigation continuesRead the file →A reported undercover payment, a denial and a closed investigation. What the available record says.
Probe closed · no chargesRead the file →A Senate letter questioned whether foreign investment in Affinity Partners could buy influence with the Trump family.
Congressional conflict-of-interest inquiryBannon pleaded guilty in New York to a scheme to defraud donors to the We Build the Wall campaign.
State guilty pleaPublic schedules, verified reporting and a record of what changed.
Reuters reported an undercover cash payment; federal officials said their review found no credible evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
A Senate letter questioned whether foreign investment in Affinity Partners could buy influence with the Trump family.
Disclosed sales raised timing questions. The available reporting also describes ethics compliance and a divestment agreement.
The SEC alleged late disclosure of Twitter stock purchases. A judge approved a settlement while expressing concerns about its terms.
Bannon pleaded guilty in New York to a scheme to defraud donors to the We Build the Wall campaign.
Bannon’s federal contempt case is separate from the border-wall fundraising case.
A New York jury convicted Trump of falsifying business records; he received no prison term, fine, or probation.
The New York civil business-fraud case produced a liability ruling, followed by a major appellate change to the financial penalty.
A New York judge ordered Trump to pay damages over misuse of his charitable foundation.
Weisselberg’s tax case and later perjury case arose from different conduct.
His criminal history predates Trump’s presidency; Trump later granted him clemency.
Trump’s former campaign chairman was convicted of financial crimes and entered a separate conspiracy plea.
Stone was convicted of obstructing Congress, witness tampering, and lying to Congress.
The former deputy campaign chairman received a short jail sentence after extensive cooperation.
Flynn’s criminal prosecution ended without a sentence after Trump pardoned him.
The archive includes former allies who later opposed Trump.
The case concerned refusing a congressional subpoena for documents and testimony.
The House Ethics Committee issued findings that were separate from the federal criminal investigation.
This settlement must not be confused with the separate Homan cash-payment allegation.
The case arose from false claims about Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss.
The 2023 racketeering indictment alleged an effort to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election result. The remaining prosecution was dropped in 2025.
Powell accepted a plea in the election-interference prosecution.
The legal status of a first-offender plea differs from an ordinary final conviction.
Ellis pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting false statements and writings.
Collins’s case involved a criminal plea, not just scrutiny of a well-timed trade.
Hunter admitted misusing campaign money for personal spending.
A Republican fundraiser’s admitted lobbying offense is distinct from questions about later business contracts.
The DOJ sought to require registration over alleged lobbying on China’s behalf.
The complete record includes acquittals, even when the original allegations drew extensive coverage.
The former campaign adviser’s case involved statements to investigators.
A former social associate is included with the nature and limits of that connection clearly stated.
Carroll obtained separate civil awards involving sexual abuse and defamation; the appellate record matters too.
A luxury-configured aircraft raised questions about its stated deportation and official-travel purposes.
Lawmakers questioned the cost and timing of replacing government aircraft.
Lawmakers questioned a $220 million advertising campaign featuring Noem.
Reporting questioned whether outside income appeared in Noem’s federal disclosures.
Campaign Legal Center asked federal ethics officials to examine disclosed holiday gifts.
Critics described DOJ’s Anti-Weaponization Fund as a “slush fund.” Its cancellation and subsequent court proceedings are part of the record.
The regulatory settlement and the later private lawsuit had different outcomes.
This concerns takeover statements, separate from delayed stock-ownership disclosure.
The earlier cancellation was reversed.
The court’s rejection is part of the allegation’s record.
Jacqueline McAferty alleged deceptive collection of voters’ information. [1]
Employees challenged Musk’s exercise of governmental power without Senate confirmation.
A former employee alleged unequal pay, promotion discrimination and retaliatory firing. [1]
This is an allegation against Tesla, not a personal charge against Musk.
Environmental groups challenged operation of gas turbines without air permits. [1]
Lawmakers questioned Musk’s overlapping public and commercial roles. [1]
Investors’ fraud and trading allegations were rejected. [1]
Common Cause and Michael Khalili allege intimidation and misuse of observers’ information.
Better Markets challenges the process used to develop bank-capital rules.
A constitutional challenge to federal election rules remains pending.
A lawmaker questions Tesla’s driver-monitoring safeguards.
Residents seek records about public incentives; SpaceX claims confidentiality protections.
Try another name or clear your filters. Coverage is non-exhaustive; a missing result is not a finding about a person.
