FOLLOW THE MONEY. READ THE RECORD.
Latest reporting ↗Search the files ⌕

← Back to the Epstein vault

THE EPSTEIN RECORD / PEOPLE INDEX

The connection.
The conduct.
The answer.

Follow the people, the money and the access. 30 reviewed figures, with the evidence and the response kept together.

Find the person. Check the record.

Search a name, a role or conduct. Filter by the type of record and connection.

Browse the complete list of names
Regulatory or institutional findings

Alexander Acosta

Former federal prosecutor; government-handling context

Connection
Led the U.S. Attorney’s Office that negotiated the 2007 federal non-prosecution agreement. This is official-handling context, not a claim of personal association.
Record under scrutiny
DOJ’s 2020 review found poor judgment in the deal and the treatment of victims.
Response & outcome
The same review found no professional misconduct and no evidence that improper considerations drove the agreement. Those limits belong beside the criticism.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Allegations later withdrawn or settled

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew)

Former British royal; Epstein and Maxwell associate

Connection
Maintained a relationship with Epstein and Maxwell, including contact after Epstein’s Florida imprisonment.
Record under scrutiny
Virginia Giuffre alleged sexual abuse when she was 17. Sjoberg also described inappropriate touching in her deposition. Separately, Scottish police reported early inquiries into Epstein-related visits to Balmoral in October 2026.
Response & outcome
Andrew denied Giuffre’s allegations. Their 2022 civil settlement avoided a trial and did not establish liability. A police inquiry is not a conviction.
Read the sources (4)
Direct entry link
Documented contact; distinct from abuse

Steve Bannon

Former Trump adviser; filmmaker

Connection
Exchanged friendly messages with Epstein in 2018–19 and recorded interviews with him.
Record under scrutiny
The communications and documentary work raise questions about helping rehabilitate Epstein’s reputation years after his conviction.
Response & outcome
Bannon has described the filming as documentary work rather than media coaching. The cited messages and reporting do not establish that he participated in Epstein’s sexual crimes.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Documented contact; distinct from abuse

Ehud Barak

Former Israeli prime minister

Connection
Maintained business dealings with Epstein and visited his properties, including after Epstein’s conviction.
Record under scrutiny
His continued access and a 2015 business relationship prompted questions about why he remained involved with a convicted sex offender.
Response & outcome
Barak denied wrongdoing and knowledge of trafficking, expressed regret and said he ended the business relationship after Epstein’s 2019 arrest. The cited reporting does not establish participation in abuse.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Financial relationship under scrutiny

Leon Black

Apollo co-founder; Epstein financial client

Connection
An Apollo-commissioned review reported that Black paid Epstein $158 million during 2012–17 for personal financial and tax services, after Epstein’s conviction.
Record under scrutiny
The House referred Black for contempt over Epstein-probe subpoenas in September 2026. He sued Rep. Robert Garcia for defamation on November 4 over allegations about his involvement.
Response & outcome
Black denies knowing about Epstein’s crimes. The commissioned review reported no evidence of his involvement in criminal activity. Contempt referral is not a criminal conviction, and the defamation suit does not decide the underlying claims.
Read the sources (3)
Direct entry link
Criminal charges; no trial verdict

Jean-Luc Brunel

Modeling agent; Epstein associate

Connection
A modeling agent close to Epstein, accused of exploiting promises of modeling work to facilitate abuse.
Record under scrutiny
French authorities brought rape-related charges involving minors. He died in a Paris jail in February 2022 while awaiting trial.
Response & outcome
Brunel denied wrongdoing. His death before trial means those charges did not produce a trial verdict against him.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Documented contact; distinct from abuse

Bill Clinton

Former U.S. president; traveler on Epstein’s aircraft

Connection
Traveled on Epstein’s aircraft and was questioned by Congress about his relationship with him in February 2026.
Record under scrutiny
The record raises questions about access and association. Aircraft travel or a photograph does not establish participation in sexual abuse.
Response & outcome
In his 2026 opening statement, Clinton denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes and said he had stopped associating with him before the 2008 guilty plea. The records cited here do not establish misconduct by Clinton.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Allegations later withdrawn or settled

Alan Dershowitz

Epstein defense lawyer; retired law professor

Connection
Represented Epstein and was separately accused by Giuffre of sexual abuse.
Record under scrutiny
The historical allegation must be read with its later correction: in November 2022, Giuffre acknowledged she may have misidentified Dershowitz.
Response & outcome
Dershowitz consistently denied the accusation. The parties dismissed their remaining litigation with prejudice without a payment. The correction is part of the record, not a footnote to omit.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

Glenn Dubin

Financier; Epstein social contact

Connection
Appears in Giuffre’s deposition account of people to whom she says she was directed.
Record under scrutiny
Giuffre alleged Maxwell pressured her to have sex with Dubin.
Response & outcome
Dubin denied the claim and said he had records contradicting it. The cited allegation and denial are not a court finding.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Criminal conviction

Jeffrey Epstein

Financier; central offender

Connection
The central figure in the abuse, trafficking and financial records collected in this vault.
Record under scrutiny
Pleaded guilty to Florida state sex offenses in 2008. Federal prosecutors charged him with trafficking minors and conspiracy in 2019.
Response & outcome
The Florida conviction and the later federal indictment are different outcomes. He died in custody before the 2019 federal case went to trial.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Financial relationship under scrutiny

Bill Gates

Microsoft co-founder; philanthropist

Connection
Gates and foundation personnel engaged with Epstein after his conviction on proposed philanthropic arrangements.
Record under scrutiny
The foundation’s July 2026 review examined 2011–14 dealings, including a proposed donor fund and an introduction to the International Peace Institute. Governance and vetting safeguards were subsequently strengthened.
Response & outcome
The foundation expressed regret. Its commissioned review found no evidence the foundation paid Epstein, participated in his criminal activities or knew of his ongoing trafficking. Those conclusions have the scope of that review, not a blanket finding about every person or interaction.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Named in non-prosecution agreement

Lesley Groff

Former Epstein executive assistant

Connection
An assistant named in the Florida agreement’s potential-co-conspirator provision.
Record under scrutiny
Her scheduling role and the agreement warrant scrutiny; being named in the provision does not establish guilt.
Response & outcome
Through her lawyer, Groff denied knowing about illegal activity or knowingly booking travel for minors.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

Darren Indyke

Epstein lawyer and estate co-executor

Connection
Served as Epstein’s longtime personal lawyer and later an estate co-executor.
Record under scrutiny
New Mexico’s October 2026 civil complaint alleges he and Richard Kahn helped finance and conceal trafficking through Epstein-related companies and accounts.
Response & outcome
Indyke has denied knowing about the abuse. A separate survivor class settlement involved no admission of wrongdoing. The New Mexico complaint contains allegations, not findings.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Regulatory or institutional findings

Joi Ito

Former MIT Media Lab director

Connection
Cultivated Epstein as a donor after his conviction.
Record under scrutiny
MIT’s 2020 review identified Ito and Seth Lloyd as driving post-conviction donations and visits. The institution acknowledged serious errors of judgment.
Response & outcome
Ito resigned in 2019 and apologized. These institutional findings concern donations and access, not a criminal finding of participation in abuse.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

Richard Kahn

Epstein accountant and estate co-executor

Connection
Managed accounting matters for Epstein and became an estate co-executor.
Record under scrutiny
New Mexico’s October 2026 civil complaint alleges he and Indyke used financial roles and entities to facilitate and conceal trafficking.
Response & outcome
Kahn has denied knowing about the abuse. The separate survivor settlement admitted no wrongdoing. The state’s new civil allegations have not been established by the cited complaint.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Named in non-prosecution agreement

Sarah Kellen

Former Epstein assistant

Connection
Worked for Epstein and was named among potential co-conspirators in the Florida non-prosecution agreement.
Record under scrutiny
The agreement’s protection for named employees is a central accountability question; its wording is not a verdict.
Response & outcome
In her 2026 congressional account, Kellen described abuse by Epstein and Maxwell. Read that account alongside the earlier record. The agreement itself is not a finding of her guilt.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Regulatory or institutional findings

Seth Lloyd

MIT professor

Connection
Accepted research donations and a personal gift from Epstein.
Record under scrutiny
MIT’s review found he deliberately failed to identify Epstein as the source of two 2012 donations and did not report a personal $60,000 gift received in 2005 or 2006.
Response & outcome
He acknowledged the personal gift and apologized. This is an institutional finding about disclosure and donor dealings, not a conviction for abuse.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Documented contact; distinct from abuse

Howard Lutnick

Business executive; Trump administration official

Connection
In his May 2026 congressional interview, Lutnick confirmed having lunch on Epstein’s island with family and friends in December 2012, after Epstein’s conviction.
Record under scrutiny
The later contact drew scrutiny because Lutnick had described an earlier break with Epstein. House investigators questioned him about the relationship in May 2026.
Response & outcome
Lutnick described limited interactions and denied witnessing illegal conduct. The interview and contradictory-timeline questions are not findings that he participated in sexual abuse.
Read the sources (3)
Direct entry link
Official investigation reported

Peter Mandelson

Former British minister and ambassador

Connection
Maintained a close relationship with Epstein. Released correspondence prompted scrutiny of his handling of government information.
Record under scrutiny
UK authorities investigated suspected misconduct in public office over alleged information sharing. He was arrested and released in February 2026.
Response & outcome
Mandelson denied wrongdoing. An arrest and investigation are not a finding of guilt. The cited government account confirms a police referral; it does not resolve criminal liability.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Named in non-prosecution agreement

Nadia Marcinkova

Epstein employee named in the Florida agreement

Connection
Named in the same potential-co-conspirator provision as Kellen, Groff and Ross.
Record under scrutiny
The scope of that non-prosecution provision is an accountability issue; a name in it is not proof of a specific offense.
Response & outcome
The cited agreement is not a conviction or a universal grant of immunity. This entry does not infer personal misconduct from its wording alone.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Criminal conviction

Ghislaine Maxwell

Epstein’s close associate; convicted participant

Connection
Helped Epstein recruit, groom and abuse underage girls, as established in her federal prosecution.
Record under scrutiny
A jury convicted her in December 2021. She received a 20-year sentence in June 2022.
Response & outcome
She contested the prosecution. The cited conviction and sentence concern her conduct; they do not convict other people named in the archive.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

George Mitchell

Former U.S. senator and diplomat

Connection
Named in Giuffre’s account of alleged sexual encounters arranged by Epstein or Maxwell.
Record under scrutiny
Giuffre alleged she was directed to Mitchell.
Response & outcome
Mitchell denied ever meeting her. This is a disputed witness allegation, not a finding of guilt.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Documented contact; distinct from abuse

Elon Musk

Technology executive; former Trump adviser

Connection
Emails from 2012–13 show discussions of parties and possible visits to Epstein’s island after his conviction.
Record under scrutiny
The exchanges raise questions about the extent of contact compared with Musk’s public descriptions. An invitation or proposed trip does not establish an actual visit.
Response & outcome
Musk says he declined invitations and denies visiting the island or wrongdoing. The material cited here does not establish sexual misconduct by Musk.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Regulatory or institutional findings

Martin Nowak

Harvard researcher; Epstein-funded program director

Connection
Led Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, a major beneficiary of Epstein’s pre-conviction funding.
Record under scrutiny
Harvard’s 2020 review documented Epstein’s continued access to the program after his conviction, including more than 40 visits in 2010–18.
Response & outcome
Harvard reported institutional and individual shortcomings while saying it did not accept new Epstein gifts after 2008. The cited review is about donor access and governance, not a criminal finding against Nowak.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

Bill Richardson

Former New Mexico governor and U.S. ambassador; died 2023

Connection
Named by Giuffre in her account of men she says she was pressured to have sex with.
Record under scrutiny
Her deposition alleged Epstein or Maxwell directed her to Richardson.
Response & outcome
Richardson denied the allegation and ever meeting Giuffre. The historical allegation was not established by the cited testimony alone.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Named in non-prosecution agreement

Adriana Ross

Former Epstein employee

Connection
Named in the Florida non-prosecution agreement’s potential-co-conspirator provision.
Record under scrutiny
The provision is part of the record of how Epstein’s prosecution was resolved and whom the deal protected.
Response & outcome
The cited provision is not a conviction or an adjudicated finding of her conduct. No individual response is evaluated in this short entry; the full court record supplies the agreement’s terms.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Regulatory or institutional findings

Jes Staley

Former JPMorgan executive and Barclays chief executive

Connection
Had a close, prolonged relationship with Epstein, documented in emails examined by the UK financial regulator.
Record under scrutiny
The FCA found he approved misleading statements to the regulator about the relationship and their last contact. The Upper Tribunal upheld the senior-management ban in June 2025; a final notice followed in July.
Response & outcome
Staley challenged the regulatory action, and the tribunal rejected his challenge. This is a finding about regulatory candor and integrity, not a criminal conviction for Epstein-related sexual abuse.
Read the sources (2)
Direct entry link
Documented contact; distinct from abuse

Larry Summers

Former Harvard president and U.S. Treasury secretary

Connection
Maintained a personal correspondence and meetings with Epstein long after the 2008 conviction.
Record under scrutiny
Released emails included seeking Epstein’s advice about a relationship. Harvard announced his planned retirement from faculty appointments during its 2026 review.
Response & outcome
Summers called the association a serious error of judgment. The cited correspondence and institutional fallout do not establish participation in Epstein’s sexual crimes.
Read the sources (1)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

Donald Trump

Political figure; former social acquaintance

Connection
Socialized with Epstein in Palm Beach. Court records also include the separate, anonymous 2016 civil allegations linked in the vault.
Record under scrutiny
The 2016 plaintiff alleged rape and sexual assault at 13. Other witnesses’ references concern an introduction or social contact and do not make the same allegation.
Response & outcome
Trump denied the allegations. The plaintiff withdrew the 2016 case before trial; the claims were not adjudicated. Do not conflate the trial witness “Jane” with that plaintiff.
Read the sources (3)
Direct entry link
Disputed civil or witness allegations

Les Wexner

Retail billionaire; Epstein financial client

Connection
Gave Epstein extensive control over his finances, including power of attorney. Epstein also served as a Wexner Foundation trustee.
Record under scrutiny
Survivors’ 2026 civil suits allege Wexner and related entities enabled and supplied resources for Epstein’s abuse. His long financial relationship is distinct from proof that he knew about trafficking.
Response & outcome
Wexner denies knowledge of or involvement in Epstein’s crimes. He says he cut ties in 2007 after discovering misappropriated funds. The civil allegations are not findings.
Read the sources (3)
Direct entry link

Keep the distinctions.

Evidence has different forms.

A criminal conviction differs from an indictment, a civil complaint, a regulatory finding and an email. A withdrawal or settlement does not establish the truth of the original allegation. A commissioned review has a defined scope and is labeled as such.

The category on each entry highlights its main source of scrutiny; it is not a complete legal history. The source links show dates, provenance and the supporting documents or reporting.

There is no guilt-by-contact rule.

Travel, a dinner, a donation or a name in an address book cannot alone establish knowledge of trafficking. Corrections, denials and limiting findings belong with the original claim. Victims and witnesses are not placed here merely for appearing in files.

The directory uses public court records, official reviews, first-person responses and attributed reporting. It does not present a verified “client list.” New evidence can change an entry.