Background files and directly linked reporting. Case inclusion describes the subject matter, not a finding of wrongdoing.
CREW alleges misuse of the Judgment Fund, citing the attempted Anti-Weaponization Fund and other settlements. Its new paper proposes disclosure and independent review requirements.
New watchdog paper; no verified change to rescission
A luxury-configured aircraft raised questions about its stated deportation and official-travel purposes.
Lawmakers questioned the cost and timing of replacing government aircraft.
Lawmakers questioned a $220 million advertising campaign featuring Noem.
Critics described DOJ’s Anti-Weaponization Fund as a “slush fund.” Its cancellation and subsequent court proceedings are part of the record.