Appeals court revives challenge to ICE actions at houses of worship
Source published: Oct 24, 2026 · 3:04 PM EDT · Event: 2026-10-20
A divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit revived a challenge by 27 Christian and Jewish organizations to the Trump administration's policy allowing broader immigration-enforcement activity at or near houses of worship. The 2-1 panel held that the organizations likely have standing because their members face an imminent threat of increased enforcement, the alleged harm is traceable to the policy change and the requested relief could redress that harm at least in part.
Response / context
The panel reversed the district court's denial of the organizations' preliminary-injunction motion and sent the motion back for further consideration. It did not decide whether the administration's policy violates the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act or the Administrative Procedure Act, and it did not itself impose an injunction or restore the prior sensitive-locations guidance. Judge Florence Pan, joined by Judge Robert Wilkins, wrote the majority opinion. Judge Neomi Rao dissented, arguing that the organizations had not clearly shown that restoring earlier guidance would change enforcement practices and therefore had not established redressability. The Justice Department had argued that the organizations needed specific evidence of an imminent operation at an individual congregation. The administration may continue contesting standing and the merits in further proceedings; no later district-court injunction or appellate order was identified during the Ledger's review.
Dates and scope
Source publication: Oct 24, 2026 · 3:04 PM EDT
Event or conduct: 2026-10-20. The D.C. Circuit filed its 50-page opinion on October 20. Bloomberg Law and Courthouse News Service published contemporaneous reports that day, while later reports renewed attention to the ruling on October 24. The Ledger reviewed the full opinion and independent reporting at 3:04 p.m. EDT on October 24. The judicial ruling occurred October 20; the Ledger source review and publication are dated October 24.
This brief preserves the available response and disposition. Coverage is non-exhaustive. How we review sources.
Read the original sources
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: Mennonite Church USA v. Department of Homeland Security, No. 25-5209 ↗
Primary 50-page October 20 opinion reviewed for the standing holding, 2-1 disposition, remand, scope of the unresolved merits questions and Judge Rao's dissent
- Bloomberg Law, Suzanne Monyak: Bid to Curb ICE Arrests at Churches Revived by Appeals Court ↗
October 20 independent report describing the ruling, the organizations' allegations, the Justice Department's standing argument and the dissent
- Courthouse News Service, Benjamin S. Weiss: DC Circuit sides with religious groups in fight to block ICE church raids ↗
October 20 independent report confirming the 2-1 disposition, judicial lineup and remand for reconsideration of preliminary relief
Keep following this record
The Pardon Ledger is a free weekly email: new clemency grants and money entries, each with its sources, the response on record, and what changed.
Latest issue: Whose names are on the filings ↗
Or follow @innercircleledger.com on Bluesky and @PardonLedger on X · Support the Ledger · Download the data