Six citizens sue Trump over White House press exclusions
Source published: Oct 26, 2026 · 10:49 AM EDT · Event: 2026-10-26
Six citizens filed a federal lawsuit against President Donald Trump, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung and Secret Service Director Sean Curran. Roth v. Trump, No. 1:26-cv-09327 in the Southern District of New York, alleges that excluding news organizations from White House press facilities because of their coverage violates the public's First Amendment right to receive independent reporting. The plaintiffs seek a declaration that the alleged policy is unconstitutional and an injunction barring its enforcement. The complaint and preliminary-injunction motion are party filings, not court findings, and no judge had granted the requested relief at the time of review.
Response / context
A White House spokesperson told The Washington Post that outlets accused by the administration of misinformation and defamation remain able to report from outside the White House. The Justice Department did not respond to the Post's request for comment. In the separate litigation brought by CNN, MS NOW and Politico, the administration has argued that journalists have no constitutional right to access restricted presidential facilities. The new plaintiffs contend that White House press areas are limited public forums and that viewpoint-based exclusions also injure citizens who rely on independent reporting. Those are opposing legal positions. A preliminary injunction in the separate CNN case protects the three outlets while that litigation continues; it is not a final judgment in that case and does not resolve Roth v. Trump.
Dates and scope
Source publication: Oct 26, 2026 · 10:49 AM EDT
Event or conduct: 2026-10-26. The Knight First Amendment Institute and Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic filed the complaint and preliminary-injunction motion on October 26 in the Southern District of New York. Associated Press published its report at 2:49 p.m. UTC, or 10:49 a.m. EDT. The Washington Post published its report and the White House response at 11:42 a.m. EDT. The Ledger reviewed the primary case pages and both reports shortly after 1 p.m. EDT. Filing, news-publication and source-review times are distinct.
This brief preserves the available response and disposition. Coverage is non-exhaustive. How we review sources.
Read the original sources
- Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University: Roth v. Trump ↗
Primary litigation page confirming the October 26 complaint and preliminary-injunction motion, case number 1:26-cv-09327 and the plaintiffs' limited-public-forum theory; it records filings, not a judicial ruling
- Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University: Complaint in Roth v. Trump ↗
Primary filing page dated October 26; the embedded complaint itself was not text-extractable through the reviewed tools, so detailed allegations and requested relief are attributed to the Institute's case summary and independent reporting
- Associated Press, Jocelyn Noveck: 6 citizens sue Trump, saying media ban deprives them of news as audience stakeholders ↗
October 26 report identifying the parties, allegations and requested declaration and injunction, while distinguishing this case from the separate media-company litigation
- The Washington Post, Scott Nover: White House is sued again over media bans as press groups seek wider injunction ↗
October 26 report carrying the White House response, Justice Department nonresponse and procedural context from the separate CNN, MS NOW and Politico case
Keep following this record
The Pardon Ledger is a free weekly email: new clemency grants and money entries, each with its sources, the response on record, and what changed.
Latest issue: Whose names are on the filings ↗
Or follow @innercircleledger.com on Bluesky and @PardonLedger on X · Support the Ledger · Download the data